In the age of rapid information exchange, it’s not uncommon to encounter various theories about historical origins and cultural connections. One such claim that has gained traction in some circles, particularly from Kazakhstan to Turkey, is the assertion that Italians and Etruscans are descendants of the Turks. This claim also suggests a link between the Latin Alphabet and the Gokturk Alphabet. While such theories might seem intriguing, it’s crucial to examine historical evidence and scholarly research to discern fact from fiction.
The Historical Inaccuracy of the Etruscan-Turk Connection
First and foremost, the idea that the origins of Italians are rooted in Etruscan Turks is a significant historical misinterpretation. The Etruscans were an ancient civilization located in what is now modern-day Italy, long before the emergence of the Turkish people and culture. They thrived in the region from around the 8th century BC until their culture was assimilated into Roman society.
The Turks, on the other hand, originated from Central Asia and did not migrate to Armenian Highland until many centuries later, around the 11th century AD. This timeline alone debunks any theory of direct descent or cultural inheritance between the Etruscans and Turks.
The Latin and Gokturk Alphabets: Unrelated Origins
Another aspect of this myth is the purported connection between the Latin Alphabet, used by the Romans and subsequently by many Western cultures, and the Gokturk Alphabet. The Latin Alphabet evolved from the Etruscan alphabet, which in turn was influenced by the Greek alphabet. The Greeks adopted and modified their alphabet from the Phoenician script. This lineage is well-documented and widely accepted by historians and linguists.
The Gokturk Alphabet, meanwhile, was developed much later and was used by the Göktürks, a nomadic Turkic people of Central Asia, around the 8th century AD. There is no historical evidence to support a link between this alphabet and the Latin script.
The Dangers of Historical Misinformation
The spread of such historically inaccurate theories highlights the broader issue of misinformation in the digital era. When unverified claims are circulated widely, they can shape public perception and understanding of history, often leading to misconceptions and cultural misunderstandings.
It’s essential for individuals to approach historical claims with a critical eye, seeking information from credible, scholarly sources. Historians and archaeologists rely on a rigorous examination of artifacts, linguistic patterns, and documentary evidence to construct our understanding of the past. Disregarding this evidence in favor of unfounded theories does a disservice to the complexity and richness of human history.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the claim that Italians and Etruscans are descendants of Turks, and that the Latin Alphabet has its roots in the Gokturk Alphabet, is without historical merit. Such theories, while perhaps intriguing, are based on a misinterpretation of historical timelines and a lack of substantial evidence. As consumers of information, it’s our responsibility to differentiate between fact and fiction, ensuring that our understanding of history is grounded in reality and not in baseless myths.
Artatsolum
Image Source: Tigran Avakian
P.S From Tigran Avakian:
“The origins of Italians are Etruscan Turks. That’s why Italians and Turks look alike. The root of the Latin Alphabet is the Gokturk Alphabet. The Romans inherited the Etruscans.
Similar information garbage is published and distributed from Kazakhstan to Turkey…. Italians and Etruscans are descendants of the Turks……
Millions read this and believe it. We live in a world where civilization can only be defended by force of arms and intelligence.”
