Culture

The so-called Turkish Rug “Phoenix and Dragon”, is an Armenian

This 15th C rug called the “Phoenix and Dragon” is one of the most famous rugs in the world. It is displayed in the Museum of Islamic Art in Berlin. It’s always been called Anatolian or Turkish. I will explain in a few paragraphs and images why this rug is clearly Armenian.

1) The Cilician Armenians and Mongols were major allies in the 13th C. Trade and cultural exchanges went on between them. Many artworks and silk robes came to Armenia and it is acknowledged by historians that Chinese/Mongol art had an influence on the art of Armenia during this period.

2) The concept of “animals in battle” was a common theme in Armenian Medieval Art years before the Mongols arrived.

3) Historians of Chinese art maintain that the “dragon and phoenix” in combat or opposition does not occur in Chinese art until the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644). There is even the suggestion that they do not appear together on the same object until then. Thus, the late thirteenth-century Armenian examples, in which the animals are clearly confronted, are enigmatic.

4) The “Phoenix and Dragon” motif was not Islamic and did not arrive in Anatolia via the Seljuks. The Mongols’ dominant religions at that time were Tengrism and Buddhism, although Ögedei’s wife was a Christian. Only in the later years of the empire 14th C, three of the four principal khanates embraced Islam, as Islam was favored over other religions.

5) There are at least two examples of the Armenian interpretation of the Mongol’s “Phoenix and Dragon” theme in 13th C Armenian manuscripts shown below. They are all in confrontation or battle.

If anyone wants to challenge me about the provenance of this rug, don’t bother unless you can show me a “Phoenix and Dragon’ motif from the Seljuks or anyone else in the region before the 15th C.

by Arto Tavukciyan

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

Azerbaijan’s Cultural Propaganda Against Armenian Heritage: Evidence, Mechanism, and the Cost to the Peace Process

What independent observers are documenting The most systematic data on the fate of Armenian monuments…

2 days ago

Dadivank and Gandzasar: Two Armenian Monasteries, and the Manufactured Case Against Them

On September 12, 2026, a delegation of some 150 diplomats and representatives from 58 countries,…

4 days ago

The September Days: How the Armenians of Baku Were Massacred in 1918

On September 15, 1918, the oil city of Baku fell to a joint Ottoman-Azerbaijani force,…

6 days ago

From Akroinon to Afyonkarahisar: The Ruined Armenian Church and the Erasure of a 3,000-Year-Old Christian Presence

A case study in the systematic destruction of Armenian heritage in Turkey and Azerbaijan The…

1 week ago

Trampling Through the Centuries: How Baku-Accredited Diplomats “Toured” Gandzasar

On September 11–12, 2026, around 150 diplomats from 58 countries accredited in Baku took part…

1 week ago

Subartu: The Forgotten Northern Deep of Armenian History

A name from the world's oldest archives Long before Urartu, long before "Armenia" appears in…

2 weeks ago