History

Contents of the Secret Letters from the Armenian Assembly and the Armenian Army of Karabakh to the Russian Emperor and Chancellor August 1724

Excerpt on the Arrival of Priest Antoniy, Kevkha Chelebi, and Priest Petr from Astrakhan

In a report dated May 17 of this year, Lieutenant General Matyushkin conveyed to the Foreign Affairs College various letters and records received from Baku via Brigadier Prince Boryatinsky through Captain Netesov. Among these communications, the report contains the following passage:

Brigadier Boryatinsky sent intelligence from Militinets Isay Bek, who had been dispatched by Kakheti’s Mamat Kuli, as well as from Armenian priest Antoniy, who had been sent from Baku to the Armenian army with Armenian Karapet. The attached documents include:

  1. Translation of a Letter from Armenian Patriarch Esai to the Commander of Baku (dated March 17), brought to the Armenian assembly by Armenian Yakov Kasparov on March 24. The patriarch did not mention the dispatch of the priests and Chelebi, except for their desire to be under the protection of His Imperial Majesty and the swift return of their envoy.
  2. Translation of an Armenian Letter Delivered by Karabakh Priest Petr (dated March 24), addressed to the commanders of Baku and Derbent, requesting assistance for their envoys to reach His Imperial Majesty. The letter does not state the sender, date, or names of those dispatched. At the bottom of the translation, it notes: The original letter was read by Priest Anton Arakelov; translated by Armenians Varlam and Petr.

On March 24, in Baku, Priest Antoniy, upon interrogation, reported only that Karapet had safely reached the patriarch and yuzbashis, and regarding his reception. However, there was no mention of Antoniy and his companions being dispatched from the army assembly with an oral message.

In the copy of a letter from the Armenian assembly’s key figures—Sergey, Esai, Abram, and others—from all provinces, addressed to His Imperial Majesty on March 5, 1724, they report receiving an edict through Karapet, which they saw with great joy and gratitude. They indicate that their forces are gathered and ready, numbering 20,000, though half are without arms. However, no mention is made of sending the priests and their companions or any oral directive.

Karapet, in a letter dated March 10 from Apanak, wrote that the people of Ganja preferred being under His Imperial Majesty’s protection rather than under the Turks and intended to communicate this with Priest Antoniy.

In a letter dated March 18, Karapet sent a copy of the oath taken by the yuzbashis Avan, Mirza, and others. They declared they had 500 armed soldiers and 6,400 without weapons, and if provided with arms and ammunition, they were ready to serve. Karapet reported that the Armenian forces he had observed could muster 20,000 troops, but suffered from provisions shortages.

From all the above-mentioned Armenian and Persian frontier letters and reports, which accompanied Lieutenant General Matyushkin’s report dated May 17, along with two earlier and later reports sent upon departure from Moscow on June 4, copies were forwarded to him by the Chancellor. The Chancellor instructed him to present these letters to His Imperial Majesty and await a resolution.

Later, a letter from Moscow to the Chancellor, dated July 30, was received in St. Petersburg on August 13, from Minas Vartapet. He reported that Armenian Priest Antoniy and the notable Kevkha Chelebi were in Astrakhan, possessing a secret so significant they could not commit it to writing, and requested their transfer to St. Petersburg. Additionally, another individual who had arrived with them should also be brought along.

On August 17, the Foreign Affairs College issued a decree to Astrakhan ordering the transfer of the three Armenians to St. Petersburg.

(Source: AVPR, f. 100, 1724, d. 2, ll. 44–45. Published in Armenian-Russian Relations in the First Third of the 18th Century, Vol. II, Part II, Yerevan, 1967, Doc. No. 284.)

Yuri Barsegov “Nagorno-Karabakh in International Law and Global Politics”

Artatsolum

Read Also:

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

Hannibal and Artaxias the Great: The Carthaginian General Who Helped Build the “Armenian Carthage”

Few episodes in ancient Armenian history capture the imagination quite like the tradition that Hannibal…

4 days ago

The Priestess of the Kingdom of Van: A 9th-Century BC Bronze Figurine in the British Museum

Five angles of one small bronze figure — and what emerges is not an abstract…

2 weeks ago

The Winged Sun and the Armenian Tiara: Royal Symbolism of the Orontid (Yervanduni) Kingdom of Commagene, 163 BC – 72 AD

Introduction Among the successor states that emerged from the fragmentation of the Achaemenid-derived Orontid (Armenian:…

2 weeks ago

A Bronze Age Vessel from Gardman: Solar Symbolism, the Sun-Cross, and the Sacred Landscape of Ancient Armenia

Article based on the explanations and interpretive observations of Angela Terian, with additional archaeological and…

2 weeks ago

Rewriting the Caucasus: A Documented Look at Azerbaijan’s Historical Revisionism Regarding Armenia

Lenin: Soviet nationalities policy, Azerbaijan SSR founded 1920, Stalin: Constitution and census fix the ethnonym…

3 weeks ago

A Painted Wall from Ancient Armenia: The New Erebuni Fresco and the Urartian-Armenian Continuity

An unprecedented find on Arin Berd hill On 23 July 2026, the French Embassy in…

3 weeks ago