Culture

Exploring the Linguistic Insights of Boghos de Constantinople: The Root of Armenian Words

Boghos de Constantinople, a distinguished official and linguist in the Ottoman Empire’s foreign ministry, offered intriguing insights into the Armenian language, particularly focusing on the root ‘AR’. This exploration uncovers how this root influences the meaning of words in Armenian, a language rich in history and culture.

The Root ‘AR’ and Its Significance

At the heart of Boghos de Constantinople’s linguistic study is the root ‘AR’, which forms the basis of the Armenian word ‘Arev’ (meaning ‘sun’). This root is pivotal in understanding the derivation of several Armenian words, revealing how the same root can lead to vastly different meanings based on its combination with other sounds.

The Affirmative Nature of ‘BARI’

The word ‘Bari’, translating to ‘good’, ‘kind’, ‘gentle’, ‘generous’, is an embodiment of positivity in the Armenian language. Boghos de Constantinople attributed its derivation to the combination of the affirmative consonant sound ‘B’ and the sun-like, manly ‘ARI’. This blend results in a word that conveys warmth and benevolence, much like the nurturing qualities of the sun.

The Contrast with ‘CHAR’

In stark contrast, the word ‘CHAR’, meaning ‘evil’, ‘bad’, ‘malignant’, ‘malevolent’, and ‘cowardly’, emerges from a combination of the negative consonant prefix ‘CH’ with ‘ARI’. This amalgamation takes the root in a completely opposite direction, demonstrating the versatile nature of language and how the addition of a single sound can alter meaning dramatically.

The Linguistic Mastery of Boghos de Constantinople

Boghos de Constantinople’s analysis showcases the depth and complexity of the Armenian language. His work underlines the importance of linguistic roots and how they shape the meaning and tone of words. Through his studies, he has provided valuable insights into the nuances of language formation and evolution, particularly in the context of Armenian linguistics.


The linguistic contributions of Boghos de Constantinople highlight the rich tapestry of the Armenian language. His analysis of the root ‘AR’ and its derivatives ‘Pari’ and ‘CHAR’ offers a fascinating glimpse into how language can simultaneously convey contrasting sentiments of warmth and malice. This exploration not only enriches our understanding of Armenian linguistics but also celebrates the broader complexities and beauties of language.

rtatsolum
Source: keghart.org

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

Dura-Europos and Ancient Armenia: A Crossroads of Priests, Inscriptions, and the Cult of Mithra

Introduction The fresco reproduced above — three white-robed priests, one wearing a tall conical hat,…

3 days ago

From Lake Van to Yerevan: The Bronze Helmet of Urartu, the First Armenia

The crested bronze helmet on the left of this comparison was not made by a…

1 week ago

A Tower Crowned by a Lion-Rider: Reading a Bronze Age Cult Vessel Through the Lens of the Armenian Highlands

A small, weathered piece of fired clay — barely 31 centimeters tall — sits today…

2 weeks ago

A Hand Reaching Through Three Millennia: The Bronze Pendant from Yeghvard

Pendant (Amulet) in the Shape of a Human Hand | 7th–6th centuries BC | Yeghvard…

3 weeks ago

Duduk (Tsiranapogh): The Ancient Voice of Armenia from the Bronze Age to UNESCO Heritage

Introduction The duduk (Armenian: դուդուկ)—traditionally known as tsiranapogh (ծիրանափող, “apricot-wood pipe”)—is one of the most…

3 weeks ago

The Earliest Known Mention of Yerevan in Armenian Epigraphy: The 874 Inscription of Sevanavank

Perched on the rocky peninsula of Lake Sevan, the medieval monastery of Sevanavank preserves one…

1 month ago