Culture

Exploring the Linguistic Insights of Boghos de Constantinople: The Root of Armenian Words

Boghos de Constantinople, a distinguished official and linguist in the Ottoman Empire’s foreign ministry, offered intriguing insights into the Armenian language, particularly focusing on the root ‘AR’. This exploration uncovers how this root influences the meaning of words in Armenian, a language rich in history and culture.

The Root ‘AR’ and Its Significance

At the heart of Boghos de Constantinople’s linguistic study is the root ‘AR’, which forms the basis of the Armenian word ‘Arev’ (meaning ‘sun’). This root is pivotal in understanding the derivation of several Armenian words, revealing how the same root can lead to vastly different meanings based on its combination with other sounds.

The Affirmative Nature of ‘BARI’

The word ‘Bari’, translating to ‘good’, ‘kind’, ‘gentle’, ‘generous’, is an embodiment of positivity in the Armenian language. Boghos de Constantinople attributed its derivation to the combination of the affirmative consonant sound ‘B’ and the sun-like, manly ‘ARI’. This blend results in a word that conveys warmth and benevolence, much like the nurturing qualities of the sun.

The Contrast with ‘CHAR’

In stark contrast, the word ‘CHAR’, meaning ‘evil’, ‘bad’, ‘malignant’, ‘malevolent’, and ‘cowardly’, emerges from a combination of the negative consonant prefix ‘CH’ with ‘ARI’. This amalgamation takes the root in a completely opposite direction, demonstrating the versatile nature of language and how the addition of a single sound can alter meaning dramatically.

The Linguistic Mastery of Boghos de Constantinople

Boghos de Constantinople’s analysis showcases the depth and complexity of the Armenian language. His work underlines the importance of linguistic roots and how they shape the meaning and tone of words. Through his studies, he has provided valuable insights into the nuances of language formation and evolution, particularly in the context of Armenian linguistics.


The linguistic contributions of Boghos de Constantinople highlight the rich tapestry of the Armenian language. His analysis of the root ‘AR’ and its derivatives ‘Pari’ and ‘CHAR’ offers a fascinating glimpse into how language can simultaneously convey contrasting sentiments of warmth and malice. This exploration not only enriches our understanding of Armenian linguistics but also celebrates the broader complexities and beauties of language.

rtatsolum
Source: keghart.org

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

Azerbaijan’s Cultural Propaganda Against Armenian Heritage: Evidence, Mechanism, and the Cost to the Peace Process

What independent observers are documenting The most systematic data on the fate of Armenian monuments…

1 day ago

Dadivank and Gandzasar: Two Armenian Monasteries, and the Manufactured Case Against Them

On September 12, 2026, a delegation of some 150 diplomats and representatives from 58 countries,…

3 days ago

The September Days: How the Armenians of Baku Were Massacred in 1918

On September 15, 1918, the oil city of Baku fell to a joint Ottoman-Azerbaijani force,…

5 days ago

From Akroinon to Afyonkarahisar: The Ruined Armenian Church and the Erasure of a 3,000-Year-Old Christian Presence

A case study in the systematic destruction of Armenian heritage in Turkey and Azerbaijan The…

1 week ago

Trampling Through the Centuries: How Baku-Accredited Diplomats “Toured” Gandzasar

On September 11–12, 2026, around 150 diplomats from 58 countries accredited in Baku took part…

1 week ago

Subartu: The Forgotten Northern Deep of Armenian History

A name from the world's oldest archives Long before Urartu, long before "Armenia" appears in…

1 week ago