Categories: HistoryPeople

Prosecutor of Gourgen Yanikian’s Case on How Truth Fell Victim to Expediency

Former California District Attorney David D. Minier wrote an article describing the trial of Gourgen Yanikian who had killed two Turkish diplomats in Santa Barbara to avenge Armenians killed during the Armenian Genocide.

“Yanikian, age 78 and a former Fresno resident, was charged with murder, and I was his prosecutor,” Minier writes in the article he contributed to Fresno Bee.

“The aging Armenian had lured the diplomats to a cottage at Santa Barbara’s exclusive Biltmore Hotel, promising gifts of art treasures for their government. Instead, he pulled a Luger pistol from a hollowed-out book and emptied it at them. He then called the reception desk, announced he had killed ‘two evils’, and sat calmly on the patio awaiting arrest,” the former prosecutor writes.

According to Minier, Yanikian’s goal was to cause “the Armenian Nuremberg” and attract the attention of the whole world to the Armenian Genocide.

Unlike Soghomon Tehlirian who had killed Talaat Pasha but had been acquitted by the jury in Germany, Yanikian was sentenced to life in prison.

Minier writes that Yanikyan’s lawyers told the judge that they wanted to call prominent historians and elderly Armenians who had survived the genocide as witnesses to the court.

In court, Yanikian told how he had witnessed Turks cutting his brother’s throat and killing 26 other members of his family at the age of 8. He testified in Armenian, with his translator being Aram Saroyan, a lawyer from San Francisco and uncle of writer William Saroyan.

Although the jury was moved to tears, Yanikian was sentenced to life in prison. In 1984, however, he was released and sent to a nursing home despite the protests of the Turkish government. Yanikian died of cancer two months later.

In his article, the former prosecutor expresses his regret that he did not have the courage to allow eyewitness survivors to give testimony. Minier had two options – to allow the jury to “disregard the law” and acquit Yanikian “for a perceived greater justice”, or “block evidence to obtain a conviction.”

He chose the latter.

David Minier also criticizes the US government for failing to recognize the Armenian Genocide, noting that the chances of the House Resolution 220 – a resolution that “would be a critical step towards ensuring an event like the Armenian genocide never takes place again” – being approved by the Congress were illusive.

This resolution languished in the Foreign Affairs Committee for months. Apparently, the US government also decided to take a safe route back then.

Minier published this article way back in January 2018. And things have changed since then.

On October 29, 2019, the United States House of Representatives finally formally recognized the Armenian Genocide with House Resolution 296.

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

MPG/Gallup International Poll of September 25, 2026: Examining an Anomalous Jump in the Numbers

1. What Was Published on September 25 Aram Navasardyan, head of the Armenian branch of…

4 days ago

Russian Gas for Armenia: Facts, Hypotheses, and What Cannot Yet Be Claimed (as of September 26, 2026)

Why the topic is back in focus Over the past four months, the gas issue…

5 days ago

The Story of a Lie: How Azerbaijan Rewrote the History of Karabakh

It's often assumed that the "Albanization" of Armenian heritage — the policy of declaring medieval…

6 days ago

Azerbaijan’s Cultural Propaganda Against Armenian Heritage: Evidence, Mechanism, and the Cost to the Peace Process

What independent observers are documenting The most systematic data on the fate of Armenian monuments…

1 week ago

Dadivank and Gandzasar: Two Armenian Monasteries, and the Manufactured Case Against Them

On September 12, 2026, a delegation of some 150 diplomats and representatives from 58 countries,…

2 weeks ago

The September Days: How the Armenians of Baku Were Massacred in 1918

On September 15, 1918, the oil city of Baku fell to a joint Ottoman-Azerbaijani force,…

2 weeks ago