Categories: History

The Progressive Judiciary of Mkhitar Gosh

Mkhitar Gosh’s judiciary was quite progressive for its time. The progressivity of a product determines its ability to adapt to a developing society. This condition implies a constant dynamic development of the product in time.

In other words, if the product is progressive at some point, then it is progressive for all times. One needs to only make additions to this product from time to time for it to work further.

This kind of scheme operates, for example, in the US, where the basic laws have been unchanged for 200 years. However, from time to time, it is corrected by the necessary additions.

It turns out that the Armenians, having an almost ready system guaranteeing the development of society and, most importantly, social justice for thousand years, are engaged in a talentless invention of a three-wheeled bicycle.

The Progressive Judiciary of Mkhitar Gosh

In 1184, the outstanding thinker, statesman, and theologian Mkhitar Gosh created the first Armenian secular judiciary. Its full name is “Religious and civil laws, mainly on the basis of the codes of Theodosius and Justinian.”

This book consists of three parts with 254 legal articles. It contains church canons and borrowed Byzantine laws as well as some requirements of the traditional Armenian way of life.

For his era, Mkhitar Gosh’s judiciary was quite progressive. For example, Gosh called for a restriction of the absolute arbitrariness of feudal lords. “God created the human nature to be free. Dependence on the lords was due to the need of land and water. But the human is as free before the law as before God.”

For the first time, the judiciary of Mkhitar Gosh received legal status in the 13th century in the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia. In the 18th century, it was translated to Georgian and entered the collection of laws compiled by King Vakhtang VI. In 1832, the incomplete translation of the book was included in the first edition of the Digest of Laws of the Russian Empire.

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

MPG/Gallup International Poll of September 25, 2026: Examining an Anomalous Jump in the Numbers

1. What Was Published on September 25 Aram Navasardyan, head of the Armenian branch of…

2 days ago

Russian Gas for Armenia: Facts, Hypotheses, and What Cannot Yet Be Claimed (as of September 26, 2026)

Why the topic is back in focus Over the past four months, the gas issue…

2 days ago

The Story of a Lie: How Azerbaijan Rewrote the History of Karabakh

It's often assumed that the "Albanization" of Armenian heritage — the policy of declaring medieval…

4 days ago

Azerbaijan’s Cultural Propaganda Against Armenian Heritage: Evidence, Mechanism, and the Cost to the Peace Process

What independent observers are documenting The most systematic data on the fate of Armenian monuments…

1 week ago

Dadivank and Gandzasar: Two Armenian Monasteries, and the Manufactured Case Against Them

On September 12, 2026, a delegation of some 150 diplomats and representatives from 58 countries,…

1 week ago

The September Days: How the Armenians of Baku Were Massacred in 1918

On September 15, 1918, the oil city of Baku fell to a joint Ottoman-Azerbaijani force,…

2 weeks ago