Categories: History

The Progressive Judiciary of Mkhitar Gosh

Mkhitar Gosh’s judiciary was quite progressive for its time. The progressivity of a product determines its ability to adapt to a developing society. This condition implies a constant dynamic development of the product in time.

In other words, if the product is progressive at some point, then it is progressive for all times. One needs to only make additions to this product from time to time for it to work further.

This kind of scheme operates, for example, in the US, where the basic laws have been unchanged for 200 years. However, from time to time, it is corrected by the necessary additions.

It turns out that the Armenians, having an almost ready system guaranteeing the development of society and, most importantly, social justice for thousand years, are engaged in a talentless invention of a three-wheeled bicycle.

The Progressive Judiciary of Mkhitar Gosh

In 1184, the outstanding thinker, statesman, and theologian Mkhitar Gosh created the first Armenian secular judiciary. Its full name is “Religious and civil laws, mainly on the basis of the codes of Theodosius and Justinian.”

This book consists of three parts with 254 legal articles. It contains church canons and borrowed Byzantine laws as well as some requirements of the traditional Armenian way of life.

For his era, Mkhitar Gosh’s judiciary was quite progressive. For example, Gosh called for a restriction of the absolute arbitrariness of feudal lords. “God created the human nature to be free. Dependence on the lords was due to the need of land and water. But the human is as free before the law as before God.”

For the first time, the judiciary of Mkhitar Gosh received legal status in the 13th century in the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia. In the 18th century, it was translated to Georgian and entered the collection of laws compiled by King Vakhtang VI. In 1832, the incomplete translation of the book was included in the first edition of the Digest of Laws of the Russian Empire.

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

The Armenian Genocide: State Crime, Mass Participation, and the Burden of Historical Responsibility

The Armenian Genocide (1915–1921 ...) was not an accident of war, nor a tragic byproduct…

2 hours ago

The First Printed Armenian Bible (Amsterdam, 1666–1668)

Introduction The first printed edition of the Bible in the Armenian language stands as one…

4 days ago

Armenopolis (Gherla): An Armenian “Ideal City” in the Heart of Europe

Armenopolis (modern-day Gherla, Romania) is a remarkable example of how the Armenian diaspora not only…

6 days ago

Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia

Regarding the Remarks of the Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group at the Permanent Council…

2 months ago

The Armenian Genetic Code: An 8,000-Year Unbroken Journey

While empires rose and fell and borders shifted across millennia, one remarkable constant has endured:…

2 months ago

Idea of a Deferred Referendum on the Status of Nagorno-Karabakh

Former Co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Group and Representative of the President of Russia, Ambassador…

2 months ago