Categories: Antiquities

Mushegh Mamikonyan and King Pap Celebrate Victory in the Battle of Dzirav – 16th-Century Miniature

In this 16th-century miniature are portrayed Sparapet (commander) Mushegh Mamikonyan, King Pap, and the soldiers of the Armenian cavalry detachment. This miniature illustrates the great victory of the Armenians over the Persian army of Shapur II in the Battle of Dzirav in 371 AD.

Thanks to this victory, Pap returned the marginal territories that had been lost during the reign of King Arshak.

King Pap then proceeded to resolve the problems with the Armenian Church. His predecessors quarreled with the church, sometimes even killing Catholicoi of All Armenians, its patriarchs. But they have never had claims on the Armenian Church’s property. King Pap was the first to do it.

He stopped paying taxes to the clergy and took away most of the land that belonged to the churches since the times of King Trdat. These steps, of course, caused outrage among the clergy. Historians of the 5th century even declared King Pap crazy and spread rumors that he had poisoned Catholicos Nerses. But according to the descriptions of historian Pavstos Byuzand, the Catholicos could have had a disease.

Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus described King Pap quite differently, mentioning him as an intelligent and courageous king. In fact, in the 4th century, among the Armenian kings, Pap was the more free-thinking and bright ruler. He made efforts towards the reunification of the country and the resolution of its internal problems.

The Sparapet was a hereditary military rank in the Armenian army. Having appeared in the 2nd century BC, it was the hereditary title of the Mamikonian dynasty.

As the commanders of all military forces of the country, the Mamikonians enjoyed particular prestige and had great political weight in Armenia. Since the second half of the 8th century, the rank became hereditary in the Bagratuni dynasty.

Vigen Avetisyan

Recent Posts

“Show Us the Tombs of Your Kings”: Royal Burials of Armenia from the Kingdom of Van to the Bagratids — and a Separate Look at Haghartsin Monastery

A source-based overview. All links are clickable and lead to primary sources or scholarly and…

6 hours ago

“Aryan by Certificate”: How the Armenians of Europe Defended Themselves Against Nazi Racial Policy

After the Nazis came to power in 1933, “Aryan” origin in Germany became a question…

6 hours ago

Guarantors, Not Witnesses: Russian Peacekeepers, the Blockade of Artsakh and the 2023 Exodus

What exactly the Russian contingent undertook to do in the Lachin Corridor, what happened between…

1 day ago

If Yerevan Falls Silent: What Would and Would Not Change for the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide

In brief. Suppose the Armenian authorities deliberately take the Genocide off the agenda. The historical…

3 days ago

Why Baku Promotes “Western Azerbaijan”: Historical Propaganda, Coercion and the Risk of Escalation

By Vigen Avetisyan. Data as of October 29, 2026. In brief. As a scholarly concept,…

6 days ago

“Ancient Azerbaijan” and “Armenians from India”: Anatomy of a Propaganda Narrative

By Vigen Avetisyan In brief. The claim that present-day Armenia is “historical Azerbaijan” and that…

1 week ago