It is of considerable interest to trace where the ancient Sumerians emerged from because of their primary contribution to human civilization.
It was suggested that Sumerians appeared in Southern Mesopotamia around five and half thousand years ago carrying with them the seeds of civilization. It was also suggested that they migrated from the west coast of India. The fact that they were not local people is suggested by the fact that their language belongs to a completely different and isolated group.
There are two further lines of investigation one may adopt to confirm this hypothesis. The first is to explore other groups in India with a similar language and the second is to carry out a physical examination of the Sumerian skeletons as available at present to detect racial similarities.
In western India, some tribal groups have existed since ancient times. Today many live on the fringes of mainstream communities as exist in India today. The mainstream communities belong to either the Indo-Aryan or Dravidian linguistic groups.
Sumerians do not belong to either. As regards the tribal, it is now fruitless to look for any similarities between Sumerian and present tribal languages in India because over thousands of years their original languages have disappeared because of the overwhelming influence of other languages.
The western tribal communities of India now speak modified versions or mixtures of the mainstream languages.
However, all is not lost because although the tribes in India such as kols and Wheels have been overly influenced, it is not so with some of their branches that migrated further east towards Australia in ancient times, and form a branch of the same human groups. One may then look for similarities between Sumerian and Austric languages.
This study has been already done and the consensus is a resounding, yes. The austric languages are indeed similar to ancient Sumerians. The similarities are so numerous and clear that they are beyond doubt or a result of any chance of coincidence. (The Austric Origin of the Sumerian Language, Language Form, vol. 22, no.1-2, Jan.-Dec. 1996.)
Therefore now it may be said with confidence that ancient Sumerians are not a linguistic isolate. It belongs to the australoid/ austric group of languages.
They belong to this group because the ancient tribal people of the Indian west coast also belonged to the same group of people, and it is from here that they must have migrated to Mesopotamia. Both the Australoid and Austric type are found in India.
There are clear reasons to rule out any other location for the Sumerian migration: Western India is geographically close to Southern Mesopotamia as compared to south East Asia and Australia and there are no know instances of civilization east of the Indus valley around five thousand years ago. Such evidence has been found in the Indus valley.
The second study concerns the physical examination of Sumerian skulls. Buxton and Rice have found that of 26 Sumerian crania they examined 22 were Australoid or Austrics. Further According to Penniman who studied skulls from other Sumerian sites, the Australoid Eurafrican, Austria, and Armenoid were the “racial” types associated with the Sumerians. Here is Penniman’s description of the Austric type found at Sumer:
“These people are of medium stature, with complexion and hair like those of the Eurafrican, to which race they are allied with dark eyes, and oval faces, broad noses, rather feeble jaws, and slight sinewy bodies.”
This description also closely describes the regal person seen on a famous clay tablet from the Indus Valley. This same tribe in an evolved version undoubtedly established the Indus civilization as well as the Sumerian one after the submergence of their coastal cities. In North-western India they would have encountered Neolithic people of Indo-European origin with which manpower they established the Indus cities.
An analysis of skeletal remains from Indus valley confirms this mixture. Both the IndoSumerian-austric language must then have persisted side by side as in Mesopotamia with the official language of the rulers being IndoSumerian-austric. Just as in Mesopotamia, ancient Sumerian was replaced by the language of the majority(Akkadians) in the Indus valley it would have been replaced eventually by an Indo-Aryan language.
At what precise moment in history this occurred is not certain but most probably the Sumerian language disappeared from India by 2000 BC. In this latter case, there was no question of preserving it for ritual purposes either.
This is because the IndoSumerian-Austric language never developed as a fully written language in India to inscribe full texts. In any case, a better Indo-Aryan language with its full-fledged script soon emerged probably because of Hittite influences in the Indian sub-continent around that time.
Contribution of Armenians to ancient civilization
In the Indus valley from which the Sumerians emerged other tribes lived near the Austric Sumerians. These were prehistoric indo-Aryan tribes of an Armenian origin – followers of the God Ara. The Indo-Aryans were fair-skinned and light-haired.
Hence the reason for the indo-Sumerians to label themselves as dark headed in comparison to the Ara people who were shining. Sumerians also began using the word Ara for fair and bright and eventually, they labeled all indo-Aryan people as Ara or Arya. The word Armenian has its origin in AR-MA, i.e. the children of Ara and Ma the fertility Goddess.
Later indo-Aryan migrations of around 1500BC into the Indus regions were apparently of Hittite origin. Some intermarriage also took place between these indo-Sumerians and Armenians probably leading to a more vigorous community than would have been possible otherwise.
A physical marriage also resulted in a marriage of the religious traditions of the Sumerian and Armenian tribes as well as the Sumerian language being influenced by Armenian. Such influences can be found by comparisons between the Armenian (or even Hungarian that emerged from ancient Armenian) and Sumerian languages. Are was the Sun God and the roots of sun worship in the world appear to have an Aryan origin rather than a Sumerian one.
Archaeologists refer to the Transcaucasus region, including modern Armenia, as the earliest known prehistoric culture in the area, carbon-dated to roughly 6000 – 4000 BC. A recently discovered tomb has been dated to 9000 BC. Another early culture in the Armenian Highland and surrounding areas, the Kura-Araxes culture, is assigned the period of ca. 4000 – 2200 BC. Armenians are one of the oldest Indo-European subgroups.
Therefore, it is not surprising that from amongst the Aryans it was the Armenians who spread around the ancient world of Mesopotamia and the Indus valley first. The Hittite Aryans that became more powerful than the Armenians by 1500 BC were close neighbors and racial cousins of the Armenians, at times clashing with them and at times co-existing, yet probably gaining from the interaction at all times.
Buxton and Rice have found that of 26 Sumerian crania they examined 22 were Australoid or Austrics and four were armennoid. Further According to Penniman who studied skulls from other Sumerian sites, the Australoid Eurafrican, Austric, and Armenoid were the “racial” types associated with the Sumerians. Certainly, it cannot be confirmed without further investigation if the Sumerian-Armenian alliance took place on Sumerian or Indian soil.
It is also not certain if it was a forced or voluntary one. The fair-skinned Armenian ladies are likely to have regarded the dark broad-nosed Sumerians as ugly. Nevertheless, it may be deduced that the earliest Sumerians who introduced civilization in our world were around 85% Austric and 15% Armenian Aryans.
Surprisingly, one of the most significant contributions to mankind should come from the Austric/australoid races. Elsewhere their contribution has not been remarkable. However, a small genetic change is all that is necessary for this achievement. Similar races have illustrated that this can happen elsewhere as well.
An example of that is Angkor Vat of Cambodia which illustrates technical mastery on an unprecedented scale, noted for its architectural and artistic perfection, not to mention its sheer size, Angkor Vat is the most famous and no doubt the most remarkable of all of the ancient temples with extraordinary architectural and artistic innovations, one of the grandest achievements of mankind.
Article Source: ezinearticles.com Ashok Malhotra